<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dreaded clutch of SoFoBoMo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2009/05/19/the-dreaded-clutch-of-sofobomo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2009/05/19/the-dreaded-clutch-of-sofobomo/</link>
	<description>A weblog for people who otherwise wouldn&#039;t.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2009/05/19/the-dreaded-clutch-of-sofobomo/comment-page-1/#comment-224495</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/?p=1103#comment-224495</guid>
		<description>Last time I used a macro lens heavily it was on the coolpix 4500; with the smaller sensor it meant the dof issue wasn&#039;t as bad.  

f1.2 is great because the camera gets more light for autofocusing, even if you have to stop down to f2.0 for dof.  You know, speaking as a person who usually takes more photos after dark than when it&#039;s light out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I used a macro lens heavily it was on the coolpix 4500; with the smaller sensor it meant the dof issue wasn&#8217;t as bad.  </p>
<p>f1.2 is great because the camera gets more light for autofocusing, even if you have to stop down to f2.0 for dof.  You know, speaking as a person who usually takes more photos after dark than when it&#8217;s light out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2009/05/19/the-dreaded-clutch-of-sofobomo/comment-page-1/#comment-224486</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/?p=1103#comment-224486</guid>
		<description>&quot;Razor thin depth-of-field&quot;?  Welcome to macro photography.  As someone who shoots almost entirely with a macro lens, I&#039;ve always been shocked when you mentioned that you want lenses that have something like a f1.2 aperture.  I&#039;m more of an f22 man myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Razor thin depth-of-field&#8221;?  Welcome to macro photography.  As someone who shoots almost entirely with a macro lens, I&#8217;ve always been shocked when you mentioned that you want lenses that have something like a f1.2 aperture.  I&#8217;m more of an f22 man myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2009/05/19/the-dreaded-clutch-of-sofobomo/comment-page-1/#comment-224440</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/?p=1103#comment-224440</guid>
		<description>heres what you do. insead of taping it to your camera find yourself a spare body cap. apply JB weld to attach lens creation to body cap. now you have a macro lens that you can take off the camera when want to use a different lens. I suggest this with only a vauge idea what your creation looks like....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heres what you do. insead of taping it to your camera find yourself a spare body cap. apply JB weld to attach lens creation to body cap. now you have a macro lens that you can take off the camera when want to use a different lens. I suggest this with only a vauge idea what your creation looks like&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

