<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New digital camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/</link>
	<description>A weblog for people who otherwise wouldn&#039;t.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155843</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155843</guid>
		<description>looking further the ef is a 1:2 and the ef-s is a 1:1. does the lens crop on the digital cameras affect that, bringing the 1:2 closer to 1:1? Another choice is maybe a &quot;Sigma Normal 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS&quot; its  1:1 from the start. quality compared to the canon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking further the ef is a 1:2 and the ef-s is a 1:1. does the lens crop on the digital cameras affect that, bringing the 1:2 closer to 1:1? Another choice is maybe a &#8220;Sigma Normal 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS&#8221; its  1:1 from the start. quality compared to the canon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155842</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155842</guid>
		<description>you mention the ef-s 60mm macro lens, what about the ef 50mm macro? for the price difference is the ef-s a definite should have vs the ef?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mention the ef-s 60mm macro lens, what about the ef 50mm macro? for the price difference is the ef-s a definite should have vs the ef?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155841</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155841</guid>
		<description>You want an SLR with a macro lens.  How you get there with a budget of 600 dollars is up to you.

I would try to find a used ef-s 60mm macro lens + the chintziest used SLR body I could find that accepts ef-s lenses and try to get the price below 600 dollars if it was me.  Or I&#039;d lobby hard for a budget increase.  

For instance I can get a used Digital Rebel for $364.00 dollars and the aforementioned macro lens for $339.00 on KEH.com (which is, admittedly, out of your budget range.)  Or if you want to stick with your existing lens you can get a used pentax body on KEH for cheap too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want an SLR with a macro lens.  How you get there with a budget of 600 dollars is up to you.</p>
<p>I would try to find a used ef-s 60mm macro lens + the chintziest used SLR body I could find that accepts ef-s lenses and try to get the price below 600 dollars if it was me.  Or I&#8217;d lobby hard for a budget increase.  </p>
<p>For instance I can get a used Digital Rebel for $364.00 dollars and the aforementioned macro lens for $339.00 on KEH.com (which is, admittedly, out of your budget range.)  Or if you want to stick with your existing lens you can get a used pentax body on KEH for cheap too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155630</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155630</guid>
		<description>The old one is a canon g3. no recalls on it and I&#039;d hate to think what they charge for fixing it. The problem with the 4500 is finding one, I dont know that we really want to buy used off ebay... tif mode would actually be fine though, I just need to have no compression artifacts.   For slr we do have the  SP 90mm adaptall macro lens (manual focus). camera it would work well on? from what I&#039;ve read the pentax ones are most compatible with the adaptall lenses. anyone have any thoughts on them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old one is a canon g3. no recalls on it and I&#8217;d hate to think what they charge for fixing it. The problem with the 4500 is finding one, I dont know that we really want to buy used off ebay&#8230; tif mode would actually be fine though, I just need to have no compression artifacts.   For slr we do have the  SP 90mm adaptall macro lens (manual focus). camera it would work well on? from what I&#8217;ve read the pentax ones are most compatible with the adaptall lenses. anyone have any thoughts on them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155625</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155625</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t top the Coolpix 4500 for getting the lens close to the object you are photographing unless you get an SLR with a macro lens.  Theoretically you can enable some sort of raw mode on it (http://e2500.narod.ru/raw_format_e.htm).  I&#039;ve been too scared to try it on mine though.  With jewelry though, getting in close might not be the answer if you want to avoid reflections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t top the Coolpix 4500 for getting the lens close to the object you are photographing unless you get an SLR with a macro lens.  Theoretically you can enable some sort of raw mode on it (<a href="http://e2500.narod.ru/raw_format_e.htm" rel="nofollow">http://e2500.narod.ru/raw_format_e.htm</a>).  I&#8217;ve been too scared to try it on mine though.  With jewelry though, getting in close might not be the answer if you want to avoid reflections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.jowilson.org/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/comment-page-1/#comment-155573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazybutable.com/weblog/archives/2007/07/24/802/#comment-155573</guid>
		<description>It might be worth it to look into sending it back for repair.  I was having major issues with CCD sensor on my Nikon going haywire and came across this:
http://www.nikonusa.com/email_images/nikonusa/service_advisory/coolpix.html
(just got it back from them good as new and all I had to pay was the $10 to ship it out to them)

See this for a few more cameras:
http://www.fatwallet.com/t/24/716298

Definitely doesn&#039;t hurt to try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be worth it to look into sending it back for repair.  I was having major issues with CCD sensor on my Nikon going haywire and came across this:<br />
<a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/email_images/nikonusa/service_advisory/coolpix.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikonusa.com/email_images/nikonusa/service_advisory/coolpix.html</a><br />
(just got it back from them good as new and all I had to pay was the $10 to ship it out to them)</p>
<p>See this for a few more cameras:<br />
<a href="http://www.fatwallet.com/t/24/716298" rel="nofollow">http://www.fatwallet.com/t/24/716298</a></p>
<p>Definitely doesn&#8217;t hurt to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

